Normal response
It's a typical answer, nothing else. I would imagine that 9 times out of five when Google get a message of a site that has fallen in-to oblivion it's something related to using techniques that go against their webmaster instructions. It might not be the cas... My site slipped from no.1 location to nowhere. Google tech people responded to my mail telling me I should have hidden text or used some type of 'illegal process'! Why don't they only admit it's their mistake? Common reply It is a typical answer, nothing else. I would imagine that 9 times out of ten when Google get an email of a site that has dropped in-to oblivion it's something related to using techniques that go against their webmaster tips. It might not be the case with you but from their perspective I should think it a fair response within the conditions. There is apparently some confusion about 'fee' A 'punishment' is applied to sites using techniques and sly material to boost their ranks in Google. A great recent example would be BMW who have been using another for the web visitor and one page for the major search engines. Since this is contrary to Google's guidelines, BMW were removed from the index entirely -- they were penalised (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/). Blocked A different type of 'penalty' even though it is indeed a purely an algorithm filter, is a webmaster using things like concealed text or keyword-stuffing, for example. That gets aggressively filtered (assuming the site isn't removed from the list) by the application of the filter( s) which in turn causes the site to drop down the search engine rank. It may seem such as a penalty but it's caused by selection, not penalty. Fee differs from 'ignoring' links When links are ignored, there's no punishment being utilized, the links just do not count. The site itself is not penalised, it is only the case that a few of the links in-to that site aren't counted. This measure not just filters out junk practices and link farms but also prevents a rival from working against another site by spamming in order to try to get intense filter. Google doesn't owe you a full time income Google doesn't owe any web-master a full time income! I should mention this as many webmasters seem to forget at times, that it's up to them to keep their sites filled with visitors, not Google, or for that matter, any internet search engine. If Google are busy with re-building their infrastructure, their database, their spiders, their algorithms or for that matter, the morning meal bar at Googleplex, and your website is adversely affected by it, then it is just too bad! Complaining to Google that your website is not at the place any longer is like complaining for the bestseller booklist that you should be at the very best of-the bestseller list even though your book is not trying to sell as well! You'll need a new product if your site no more meets the existing market requirements then. The market is not planning to change to suit you. We discovered premium finance by browsing Bing. Worry, California and Big Daddy Now could be not AT ALL the time to stress. Google are improving. Discover further on this partner article - Browse this website: treadmill desks. Things will be around the area for a time yet. If you take extreme measures for the thing that was up to recently a very placed website, you run the chance of com-pletely ruining your placements. Throughout the famous 'Florida update', several webmasters panicked and started changing, tweaking and changing items that had no bearing on their final location. Browsing To premium finance possibly provides cautions you can tell your boss. But, due to the 'changes' manufactured in haste, they did find a way to provide issues o-n themselves that took weeks to recuperate from when the dust had settled and everybody had a much better knowledge of what had happened. Steady in the wheel, Captain!.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
|